ONE PART
The way women are represented in most mainstream magazines is almost identical from each other. The talk is always involved in sexualisation of women and/ or some talk of their sex life and how they should be acting for the pleasure of men. Most research taken place over magazines has been critical of them, pointing them as a locus of ideological messages that serve to legitimize and naturalize unequal relations, which offer a narrow and restrictive template of femineity constructed around fashion, beauty and ‘how to get a man’. Magazines are charged with promoting the ‘beauty myth’ that damages women’s self-esteem and with supporting harmful social practices ranging from dieting to cosmetic surgery (Bordo, 1993; Greer, 1999; Ussher, 1997; Wolf, 1990). This relates to how I want to go against the dominant representation and how I want to create a magazine that allows women to be truly themselves and doesn’t bring down their self-esteem.
With headlines down the side of an image of a undressed woman, such as ‘how to get a man’ and about their ‘sex lives’ the target audience of these magazines being young women/ 18-30, this ingrains in women that they need to live for men and creates a dominant ideology within society that we must learn how to please a man, to therefore ‘get him’. Gender is performative and is always a doing. Gender is the repeated stylization of the body, a set of repeated acts within a highly rigid regulatory frame that congeal over time to produce the appearance of substance, of a natural sort of being (Butler 1990). This relates to the fact that these magazine covers make women perform to be sexually orientated and never intellectual.
Bibliography
Gill, R. (2009). Mediated intimacy and postfeminism: a discourse analytic examination of sex and relationships advice in a women’s magazine. Discourse & Communication, 3(4), 345-369. doi: 10.1177/1750481309343870
Butler, J. Gender trouble.